Alimony
          
         
          
         
         
         
         Menstuff® has information on
         alimony. 
          
         
         Significant reform of alimony law 
         
         
           
         
         Yesterday, Governor Deval Patrick signed alimony reform into
         law. The vote in the Massachusetts State Senate on "An Act
         Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth" was 36-0 in favor,
         and the vote in the House was 151-0.
         
         Up until now, the only way to get out of alimony was for
         one's former spouse to remarry, and some they would not so
         they could keep collecting. And there was almost no limit in
         the amount of alimony that could be awarded. Alimony never
         ended, had vague standards, its purpose was not clear, and
         there were horror stories of people forced to work in their
         retirement years. 
         
         Steve Hitner, president of Massachusetts Alimony Reform,
         told me in an interview that the law's biggest
         accomplishment is the "sunset provision" so that that
         "people can go on their lives without one person being
         dependent on the other." The sunset provision put term
         limits on how long alimony may last. For instance, with a
         few exceptions, people cannot be forced to pay alimony
         beyond the usual retirement age. 
         
         Unlike current alimony legislation, the new law clearly
         sets out different kinds of alimony instead of it all being
         just undifferentiated "alimony." This follows the trends of
         other states. Now judges must give greater scrutiny as to
         why they are awarding alimony, rather than a general
         notation that it somehow vaguely feels "just." 
         
         One new category is "rehabilitative alimony" in which an
         ex-spouse is expected to become economically self-sufficient
         by a certain time such as by reemployment or completion of
         job training. Rehabilitative alimony is limited to five
         years, although it can be extended if a number of factors
         are shown through "compelling circumstances," which is a
         high standard. To get rehabilitative alimony beyond five
         years, the ex-spouse must show that (1) there are unforeseen
         events that prevent the recipient spouse from being
         self-supporting ; (2) the recipient endeavored to become
         self-supporting; and (3) the payer has a continuing ability
         to pay and no undue burden. 
         
         "Reimbursement alimony" is for recipient spouses of
         marriages of five years or less. Its purpose is to
         compensate for the economic or noneconomic contribution to
         the financial resources of the payer ex-spouse, such as
         enabling the payer spouse to complete an education or job
         training. Under the new law, reimbursement alimony is not
         modifiable. 
         
         "Transitional alimony" is also for marriages of five
         years or less for the purpose of transitioning the recipient
         to an adjusted lifestyle or location as a result of the
         divorce. It is not the dramatic effort to reeducate or
         retrain as in rehabilitative alimony, but like
         rehabilitative alimony, is meant to allow an ex-spouse to
         get back on one's feet. It is limited to three years. 
         
         Finally, there is "general term alimony" for the
         ex-spouse that is "economically dependent," perhaps by some
         permanent physical disability. For marriages that are five
         years or less, general term alimony many only last 50
         percent of the marriage length. For marriages that are 5-10
         years, the maximum general term alimony term is 60 percent
         of the marriage length. For marriages that are 10-15 years
         old, the maximum general term alimony term is 70 percent of
         the marriage length. For marriages that are 15-20 years old,
         the maximum general term alimony term is 80 percent of the
         marriage length. For long term marriages (more than 20
         years), general term alimony will end at retirement age as
         defined by the Social Security Act. 
         
         Under the law that will expire, case law stated that
         judges could consider the income of the new spouse of the
         person obligated to pay child support, in effect making the
         new spouse indirectly responsible for the alimony. This, of
         course, made for many an angry second wife. Under the new
         law, "In the event of the payer's remarriage, income and
         assets of the payer's spouse shall not be considered in a
         re-determination of alimony in a modification action." 
         
         And simply co-habitating and refusing to remarry will no
         longer keep the alimony spigot flowing. Under the new law,
         "General Term Alimony shall be suspended, reduced or
         terminated upon the cohabitation of the recipient spouse
         when the payer shows that the recipient has maintained a
         common household with another person for a continuous period
         of at least three months." 
         
         Under the new law, child support paid shall be deducted
         before considering alimony. Moreover, under prior case law,
         judges could kick in alimony after child support ended --
         not anymore. Where the court orders alimony concurrent with
         or subsequent to a child support order, the combined
         duration of alimony and child support shall not exceed the
         longer of: (i) the alimony duration available at the time of
         divorce; or (ii) rehabilitative alimony commencing upon the
         termination of child support." 
         
         Finally, the amount of alimony is limited. Under the new
         law, ". . . the amount of alimony should generally not
         exceed . . . 30 percent to 35 percent of the difference
         between the parties gross incomes established at the time of
         the order being issued. "Moreover, "Income from a second job
         or overtime work shall be presumed immaterial to alimony
         modification if: (1) A party works more than a single
         full-time equivalent position; and (2) The second job or
         overtime commenced after entry of the initial order." 
         
         Massachusetts Alimony Law Limits Payments to
         Ex-Spouses ABC News (blog) - Susanna Kim 
         Divorcees, second husbands and second wives may find reason
         to rejoice in Massachusetts. On Monday, Gov. Deval Patrick
         signed into law the Alimony Reform Act of 2011, a law
         limiting alimony payments and abolishing most lifetime
         spousal entitlements. ... 
         
         Alimony in Massachusetts Gets Overhaul, With Limits
         New York Times - Jess Bidgood - Sep 26, 2011 
         BOSTON  Gov. Deval Patrick on Monday signed into law
         new limits on alimony in Massachusetts, sharply curbing
         lifetime alimony payments in divorce cases and making a
         series of other changes to a system that critics considered
         outdated. ... 
         
         Massachusetts Sets Limits on Alimony Wall Street
         Journal - Jennifer Levitz - Sep 26, 2011 (Has a good
         film) 
         The state abolished most lifetime spousal support Monday,
         joining several states where alimony payments have come
         under scrutiny as payers argue they are struggling in the
         rocky economy. Democratic Gov. Deval Patrick signed a
         measure ... 
         
         Gov. Patrick signs sweeping overhaul of alimony laws
         Boston Herald - Sep 26, 2011 By AP Massachusetts Gov.
         Deval Patrick has signed a sweeping overhaul of the state's
         alimony statutes into law. The new law establishes
         guidelines for alimony payments and limits their duration,
         virtually ending so-called "lifetime alimony" payments
         ... 
         
         Source:  Rinaldo Del Gallo,
         hwww.berkshireeagle.com/otheropinions/ci_18983885
           
          
         
         *    *    *
         
           
         
         
  
         
         
           Contact
         Us |
         Disclaimer
         | Privacy
         Statement 
         Menstuff®
         Directory 
         Menstuff® is a registered trademark of Gordon Clay 
         ©1996-2023, Gordon Clay
       |