Menstuff® has compiled the following information on the impact
of an increased Beer Tax.
Higher Beer Taxes, 21 Drinking Age Reduces
Traffic Deaths of Young People
"Our findings suggest that communities that have been historically reluctant to regulate alcohol availability currently have the most to gain from implementing any given alcohol policy initiative," said William R. Ponicki, M.A., lead author of the study and a researcher at PIRE's Prevention Research Center in Berkeley. "The study confirms earlier findings regarding the importance of alcohol policy in preventing alcohol-related problems such as traffic crashes. But it also shows that a community should look at the whole picture."
Researchers examined traffic crash data gathered from 48 U.S. states from 1975 to 2001. Results showed that raising either the drinking age or beer taxes alone led to fewer youth-traffic fatalities. However, the study found that changing the drinking age caused a larger reduction in fatalities when beer taxes were low as opposed to when they were high. Similarly, beer taxes were more effective in reducing youth fatalities in states and years where it was legal for youth to buy and consume beer. When it is illegal for youth to buy and consume beer as it is now in all 50 US states higher beer taxes have less impact.
Since the 1988, the minimum legal drinking age has been 21 in all 50 States and the District of Columbia. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration estimates drinking age laws save more than 900 lives a year in traffic fatalities alone.
"The more a community regulates alcohol availability, the less additional benefit it might expect to achieve from enacting any new policy initiative," Ponicki said. "If a given community has very few existing alcohol-policy restrictions, any proposed new restriction could be expected to have a larger impact. If another community already has extremely strong alcohol restrictions, the same proposed new constraint might not be expected to have as much impact."
"Our findings suggest that some of the varying results across past research may simply indicate that a given public policy may not have the same effectiveness in all places and times," Ponicki said. "Specifically, a given policy change, such as a 10-percent beer-tax increase, may not give the same 'bang for the buck' when implemented in different situations."
Results are published in the May issue of Alcoholism: Clinical
& Experimental Research. The study was funded by the National
Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.