Discrimination
Menstuff® has information on
Discrimination DIVISION 5 DISCRIMINATION 839-005-0000 Purpose and Scope (1) It is the policy of the State of Oregon that unlawful discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, national origin, marital status, age, disability and other classes protected under Oregon statutes is a matter of state concern and that such discrimination threatens individual rights and privileges and menaces the institutions and foundations of a free democratic state Definitions (8) Gender expression means the manner in which an individuals gender identity is expressed, including, but not limited to, through dress, appearance, manner, or speech, whether or not that expression is different from that traditionally associated with the individuals assigned sex at birth. (9) Gender identity means an individuals gender-related identity, whether or not that identity is different from that traditionally associated with the individuals assigned sex at birth, including, but not limited to, a gender identity that is transgender or androgynous. (15) Sex means the anatomical, physiological and genetic characteristics associated with being male or female. (16) Sexual orientation
means an individuals actual or perceived
heterosexuality, homosexuality, bisexuality, or gender
identity, regardless of whether the individuals gender
identity, appearance, expression or behavior differs from
that traditionally associated with the individuals
assigned sex at birth.
Employment, Housing, Public Accomodations, Credit, State Employees,
Funeral
Home This story, inspired by a real legal case, is the center of a new ad, Funeral Home, produced by MAP as part of the Open to All public education campaign. People think discrimination like this couldnt happen, but it does and it did. This ad explains how a decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in favor of discrimination could make matters worse.
Inspired by a real case, this ad, Funeral Home, shows devastating harms of service refusals by businesses that serve the public "Funeral Home" is the latest in a series of ads that illustrate how a loss in the Masterpiece Cakeshop case would open the door to wide-ranging forms of discrimination. A ruling for the bakery in this case could sanction and encourage this type of discrimination not just against LGBT people, but also interfaith couples, people of color, women, people with disabilities, and others. A decision in this case is expected by June. LGBT people continue to be at risk for discrimination in their daily lives, even at their most painful moments, like when burying a loved one. Thirty-one states lack nondiscrimination protections for LGBT people in public places. And there are no federal nondiscrimination protections in public accommodations for LGBT people. As a result, just over half of LGBT people in the United States live in a state where businesses, including funeral homes, can refuse to serve someone because of who they are. http://www.lgbtmap.org/file/Brief-OTA-Funeral-Home-One-Pager-FINAL.pdf As a nation, we decided a long time ago that businesses and services that are open to the public should be open to all. Nobody should be turned away simply because of who they are.
Take Action:
Non-Discrimination
Laws Efforts by anti-LGBT opponents include: Plain refusals by some government officials, state legislators, and courts to fully recognize the marriages of same-sex couples and their relationship with their children; and, Refusals by individuals, businesses, government contractors, and even government employees claiming they have a religiously-based right to discriminate against LGBT people, including the children of LGBT people. These license to discriminate efforts are reflected in legislation, court cases, and agency guidance around the country. With courts requiring that state governments treat all married couples fairly, this tactic of individuals, businesses, and government agencies claiming a religious exemption to following nondiscrimination laws is gaining traction. This has an especially harmful impact on LGBT families and LGBT parents seeking to adopt or start families. A same-sex couple could be refused pregnancy and birth healthcare services, a child with two mothers could be denied entrance to their local preschool, a child could be refused critical medical treatment because she was denied an accurate birth certificate listing both parents, or a qualified, loving same-sex couple could be rejected from fostering a child in need. In fact, all of these scenarios have already happened. Also, just this year, two statesOklahoma and Kansashave passed laws granting child welfare agencies a license to discriminate against prospective parents, leaving the nations most vulnerable children with fewer prospective parents. And, the U.S. Supreme Court is poised to issue a ruling in the Masterpiece Cakeshop case by the end of June. This case has the potential to undo decades of nondiscrimination laws by allowing businesses to pick and choose which customers to serve. By refusing to recognize the marriages of same-sex couples, and by attempting to insert religious exemptions into nondiscrimination laws that protect LGBT people, the report concludes that the threats to LGBT families and their children are real. And, in states without nondiscrimination laws and in states where legislatures have pushed religious exemption laws, the ultimate result is that children are harmed. Take Action: READ the report Putting Children at Risk: How Efforts to Undermine Marriage Equality Harm Children LEARN more about the high stakes of the Masterpiece Cakeshop case with this policy brief Understanding Masterpiece Cakeshop vs. Colorado Civil Rights Commission. READ MAPs blog post for LGBTQ Families Day and share it on social media with the hashtag #LGBTQFamiliesDay SEE which states
have nondiscrimination protections
for LGBT people and families.
|
Discrimination
State United
States Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware DC Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New
Hampshire New
Jersey New
Mexico New
York North
Carolina North
Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode
Island South
Carolina South
Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West
Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Source:
www.lgbtmap.org/equality-maps/non_discrimination_laws
State United
States Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware DC Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New
Hampshire New
Jersey New
Mexico New
York North
Carolina North
Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode
Island South
Carolina South
Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West
Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming * Rank
by state population.
Source: www.lgbtmap.org/equality-maps
* * *
060118
![]() |