Menstuff® has compiled the following information on Doctors
Don't Feel Obliged to Present All Medical Options to Patients.
Survey Finds 14% of Doctors Don't Feel
Obliged to Present All Medical Options to Patients
Are They Really Doctors,
Then?
Survey Finds 14% of Doctors Don't Feel
Obliged to Present All Medical Options to Patients
The study is published in the Feb. 8 issue of The New England Journal of Medicine. It was done by University of Chicago doctors, including Farr Curlin, MD.
The researchers mailed surveys to 2,000 U.S. doctors, representing all medical specialties.
The surveys asked what a doctor's obligations are when a patient requests a legal medical procedure to which the doctor morally objects.
The vast majority -- 86% -- said physicians are obligated to present all the medical options to patients, regardless of their personal beliefs.
However, 8% disagreed, and 6% were undecided on the issue.
In addition, 63% said it would be ethical for morally conflicted doctors to "plainly" explain their moral objections to their patients.
And when asked if such conflicted doctors were obligated to refer patients to doctors without objections to the requested procedure, 29% either said "no" or were undecided.
Start Talking
"If physicians' ideas translate into their practices, then 14% of patients -- more than 40 million Americans -- may be cared for by physicians who do not believe they are obligated to disclose information about medically available treatments they consider objectionable," write Curlin and colleagues.
Curlin's team offers this advice to patients: Talk to your doctor about your views on thorny medical issues before a health emergency forces the discussion.
"Physicians and patients might engage in a respectful dialogue to anticipate areas of moral disagreement and to negotiate acceptable accommodations before crises develop," write Curlin and colleagues.
"Because patients and physicians come from many different moral traditions, religious and secular, they will sometimes disagree about whether a particular medical intervention is morally permissible," Curlin says in a University of Chicago news release.
Curlin is an assistant professor of medicine and a member of the university's MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics.
About the Study
A total of 1,144 doctors completed the survey -- a bit less than two-thirds of those contacted.
They worked in specialties including family practice, pediatrics, internal medicine, psychiatry, surgery, and obstetrics and gynecology.
Here's a quick look at the group:
Survey Details
The survey included this question: "If a patient requests a legal medical procedure, but the patients' physician objects to the procedure for religious or moral reasons, does the physician have an obligation to present all possible options to the patient, including information about obtaining the requested procedure?"
That question resulted in the 86% to 8% split.
When asked if morally conflicted doctors are ethically permitted to "plainly" describe their objections to patients, 63% said yes, while 22% said no, and 15% were undecided.
When asked if morally conflicted doctors had an obligation to refer the patient to someone who didn't object to the requested procedure, 71% said yes, 18% said no, and 11% were undecided.
Thorny Issues
The survey also covered the doctors' personal beliefs about three controversial clinical practices: sedating dying patients to unconsciousness, abortion for failed contraception, and the prescription of birth control to teens age 14-16 years without parental consent.
Not all the doctors answered those questions, although in each case, about 1,100 did.
Of the doctors who answered the sedation question, 83% didn't object while 17% objected to that practice.
On the abortion question, 48% of respondents didn't object and 52% objected to that practice.
And for the teen birth control question, 58% didn't object while 42% objected to that practice.
The survey didn't ask doctors about their own personal experiences in treating patients.
Therefore, it's not clear if the doctors had faced such dilemmas or if they treat their patients based on the opinions they expressed in the survey.
Sources: Curlin, F. The New England Journal of
Medicine, Feb. 8, 2007; vol 356: pp 593-600. News release, University
of Chicago Medical Center. www.webmd.com/content/article/131/118160.htm?ecd=wnl_lbt_022807
Are They Really
Doctors, Then?
They should not be allowed to work the emergency room or diagnose and treat patients in the areas of medicine that are in conflict with their moral codes.
They should be required to disclose their limitations to all patients and have the patient sign a disclosure statement acknowledging that they are fully aware that they may not get complete and accurate diagnosis and treatment for their condition.
Or, better yet, ask them to find another profession.
Contact the American Medical Asosciation (AMA) with your thoughts. American Medical Association. 515 N. State Street, Chicago, IL 60610 or 800-621-8335. - Gordon Clay
 |
|
 |
